Skip to content

Free tool · Level of care

Level-of-care criteria crosswalk builder

Map every factor the plan's level-of-care criteria test to the dated record that answers it, mark each one met, partly met or not documented, and see the gaps before you write the appeal. Print it, paste it into the packet or download it as a spreadsheet.

By the ClaimParrot editorial team · Rules checked · 4 cited sources

Quick answer

A level-of-care crosswalk is a table that puts each factor the plan's criteria test next to the dated record that meets it. Build it before the letter: list the factors, cite a document, day and page for each, and mark it met, partly met or not documented. Gaps tell you what to find or stop arguing.

Runs entirely in your browser. Nothing you type is sent to ClaimParrot or stored, and no patient details are needed: leave names and IDs as bracketed placeholders.

01 · The denial

What the plan decided

Use relative days (“day 9”) and leave names and ID numbers out. Every field is optional; blanks stay as brackets in the crosswalk.

Pick the criteria family the notice names. The rows are dimension names or plain-English factors, never licensed criteria text: rename them to match the plan's wording.

02 · Evidence, factor by factor

For each factor, name the record that answers it: document, day and page. Mark it honestly; a gap you find now is one the reviewer won’t.

03 · Your crosswalk

Criteria crosswalk

0 met · 0 partly met · 8 not documented

LEVEL-OF-CARE CRITERIA CROSSWALK

Level of care requested: PHP
Review type: Continued stay (concurrent)
Dates at issue: [Dates at issue]
Criteria the plan cited: [Criteria set, edition and section named in the notice]
Denial reason as stated: "[Quote the denial reason exactly]"

Summary: 0 met, 0 partly met, 8 not documented.

1. Current symptoms and functional impairment (now, compared with the last review): NOT DOCUMENTED
   Evidence: [Document, date or day, page]
   Gap / next step: Find a dated record that supports this factor, or do not argue it in the letter.

2. Risk: safety, self-harm, harm to others, relapse or withdrawal (now, compared with the last review): NOT DOCUMENTED
   Evidence: [Document, date or day, page]
   Gap / next step: Find a dated record that supports this factor, or do not argue it in the letter.

3. Why a lower level of care is not enough, or was tried and failed: NOT DOCUMENTED
   Evidence: [Document, date or day, page]
   Gap / next step: Find a dated record that supports this factor, or do not argue it in the letter.

4. Fit for this level: needs more structure than outpatient, does not need 24-hour care: NOT DOCUMENTED
   Evidence: [Document, date or day, page]
   Gap / next step: Find a dated record that supports this factor, or do not argue it in the letter.

5. Treatment-plan goals: progress, or the changes made when progress stalled: NOT DOCUMENTED
   Evidence: [Document, date or day, page]
   Gap / next step: Find a dated record that supports this factor, or do not argue it in the letter.

6. Engagement: attendance, programming hours and participation: NOT DOCUMENTED
   Evidence: [Document, date or day, page]
   Gap / next step: Find a dated record that supports this factor, or do not argue it in the letter.

7. Supports and recovery environment: family, housing, barriers to step-down: NOT DOCUMENTED
   Evidence: [Document, date or day, page]
   Gap / next step: Find a dated record that supports this factor, or do not argue it in the letter.

8. Discharge and step-down plan: criteria, next level and target date: NOT DOCUMENTED
   Evidence: [Document, date or day, page]
   Gap / next step: Find a dated record that supports this factor, or do not argue it in the letter.

GAPS TO CLOSE BEFORE SUBMITTING
- Current symptoms and functional impairment (now, compared with the last review) (not documented)
- Risk: safety, self-harm, harm to others, relapse or withdrawal (now, compared with the last review) (not documented)
- Why a lower level of care is not enough, or was tried and failed (not documented)
- Fit for this level: needs more structure than outpatient, does not need 24-hour care (not documented)
- Treatment-plan goals: progress, or the changes made when progress stalled (not documented)
- Engagement: attendance, programming hours and participation (not documented)
- Supports and recovery environment: family, housing, barriers to step-down (not documented)
- Discharge and step-down plan: criteria, next level and target date (not documented)

HOW TO USE THIS CROSSWALK
1. Put it right after the appeal letter, so the reviewer can check every statement in one place.
2. Number the enclosures in the order the crosswalk cites them, and cite the enclosure number in each row.
3. Lead the letter and the peer-to-peer with the factor the reviewer said was unmet.
4. Have the treating clinician confirm every clinical statement before anything is signed.

Prepared with the free ClaimParrot crosswalk builder (claimparrot.com/tools/level-of-care-crosswalk).
General information, not legal or clinical advice. The plan's criteria, the notice and the plan documents control.

Rather have the crosswalk built for you?

A Level-of-care packet adds this crosswalk to an appeal letter draft, an evidence checklist, a deadline plan and a peer-to-peer brief, built from one de-identified denial and checked by a person before you get it. $99, within 3 business days. Your first packet is free.

How it works

The rules behind the tool

Common level-of-care factors and the records that usually answer them
FactorRecords that usually answer itWatch for
Symptoms and functional impairmentPsychiatric evaluation, progress notes, standardized measures for the dates at issueAdmission paperwork cited for a continued-stay date
RiskDated risk assessments, incident notes, near misses since the last reviewRisk described as a diagnosis instead of observed behavior
Lower level not enoughPrior outpatient or step-down episodes and what followed, clinician's reasoningNo dates or outcomes for earlier episodes
Fit for this levelWhy the patient needs this structure, and why not a higher levelArguing for more care than the request
Progress or plan changesTreatment-plan updates with measurable goals at each reviewGoals copied forward unchanged
Engagement and attendanceAttendance logs, group and individual notes, missed days explainedUnexplained gaps in programming
Discharge planStep-down criteria, next level, target date, aftercareAn open-ended request with no end point
01

How do I build a crosswalk with this tool?

Choose the level of care and the review type, then the starting rows: common factors, ASAM dimensions or LOCUS dimensions. Quote the denial reason and name the criteria the plan cited. For each row, add the document, day and page that answers it, and set the status. The crosswalk updates as you type.

  1. 01Pick the level of care requested and whether this is an admission, continued-stay or retrospective review.
  2. 02Choose the starting rows that match the criteria family named in the notice, then rename each row to the plan's own wording.
  3. 03Quote the denial reason exactly as the notice states it, and name the criteria set, edition and section.
  4. 04For each factor, cite the record that answers it: document, relative day and page. Use one line per record.
  5. 05Mark each row honestly, add a next step for every gap, then print, copy or download the crosswalk as .txt or .csv.
02

What is a level-of-care criteria crosswalk?

It is a working table that lines up each criterion the plan applied with the evidence that meets it, so the clinician, the biller and the reviewer can all check the argument in one place. In an appeal packet it sits right after the letter, and every row points to a numbered enclosure.

Reviewers decide level-of-care requests against a criteria set: a published one such as the ASAM Criteria for substance use treatment or LOCUS for adult mental health, or the plan's own guideline. A letter that answers the criteria row by row is easier to verify than a narrative summary of the chart, and the crosswalk forces that structure before anyone drafts. The level-of-care denial guide explains the wider appeal.

03

How should I mark a row met, partly met or not documented?

Mark a row met only when a dated record from the period at issue answers it. Partly met means the record supports part of it, or only for some dates. Not documented means you could not find support. A gap is useful: either the record exists somewhere you have not cited, or the letter should not argue that factor.

  • Cite the record from the dates at issue; admission notes rarely prove a continued-stay date.
  • Prefer observable facts and measures to adjectives such as severe or unstable.
  • Ask the treating clinician about every partly met row before the letter is drafted.
  • Use not applicable for factors the plan's criteria do not test at this level.
04

What if the plan has not said which criteria it used?

Ask in writing. For employer plans, the documents relevant to the claim, including any guideline relied on, must be provided free on request, and parity rules require plans to disclose medical-necessity criteria for mental health and substance use benefits. Build the crosswalk on common factors meanwhile, then rename the rows when the criteria arrive.

The ERISA claims rule covers documents and the internal rule or guideline relied on (29 CFR 2560.503-1), and the parity rule covers disclosure of medical-necessity criteria (29 CFR 2590.712(d)). Medicaid managed care plans must give the enrollee the case file, including medical records and new evidence, free of charge (42 CFR 438.406). The criteria request letter drafts the request. If the deadline arrives first, file on time and state when you asked.

Do not paste licensed criteria text (ASAM, LOCUS, MCG, InterQual) into the rows or the appeal. Name the criterion and answer it in your own words.

05

Where does the crosswalk go in the appeal packet?

Directly after the appeal letter and before the records. Number the enclosures in the order the crosswalk cites them, so a reviewer can check each row in seconds. Bring the three strongest rows to the peer-to-peer, and keep the crosswalk for the next level of appeal if the denial is upheld.

A typical level-of-care packet runs: the appeal letter signed by the treating clinician, the crosswalk, the denial notice, then the evaluations, treatment-plan updates, progress notes, risk assessments, attendance logs and discharge plan the crosswalk cites. The peer-to-peer prep sheet turns the top rows into talking points.

Fictional example

A PHP continued-stay crosswalk

Linden Grove Behavioral (fictional) gets a continued-stay denial for an adult in PHP on day 15: the reviewer writes that symptoms can be treated in IOP. The UR lead picks PHP, continued stay and the common factors, and quotes the reason.

Five rows are met from day 10 to day 14 notes, the risk assessment from day 13 and the attendance log. Two are partly met: progress is documented, but the treatment plan was not updated after a medication change on day 12, and the discharge plan has no target date. The clinician updates both before the letter is drafted.

Names, dates, payers and amounts are invented for illustration.

Where ClaimParrot fits

What a ClaimParrot packet adds

  • A Level-of-care packet includes this crosswalk built from one de-identified denial, plus the appeal letter draft, evidence checklist, deadline plan and peer-to-peer brief, checked by a person before delivery.
  • It is $99, delivered within 3 business days, and your first packet is free. Every price is on the pricing page.
  • No patient details are needed or accepted: packets come back with placeholders your team fills in. How requests are handled is on Trust & security.

Every draft is reviewed and approved by your team. ClaimParrot does not make medical-necessity determinations or give legal advice.

Common questions

Frequently asked questions

Can I paste the plan's licensed criteria into the crosswalk rows?

No. Criteria sets such as ASAM, LOCUS, MCG and InterQual are licensed. Name the criterion or dimension and describe it in your own words; the reviewer has the text. The tool's ASAM and LOCUS rows use only the published dimension names.

Does the crosswalk replace the appeal letter?

No. The letter makes the request and the argument, signed by the treating clinician; the crosswalk is the evidence map that backs it. Most reviewers read the letter first, then use the crosswalk to check each claim against the enclosures.

Is anything I type in the crosswalk builder saved or sent?

No. The tool runs in your browser and nothing is uploaded or stored; closing the tab clears it. Use relative days and leave names and ID numbers out anyway, so the printout can be shared safely inside your organization.

Which ASAM edition do the ASAM rows follow?

Either: pick third-edition (2013) or fourth-edition (2023) rows. The numbering changed between them, so use the edition the notice or the reviewer names. The ASAM criteria guide maps one edition to the other.

Sources

Primary sources and references

  1. 29 CFR 2560.503-1: ERISA claims procedure (appeal windows, decision clocks, claim-file access) · eCFR (National Archives) · checked
  2. 29 CFR 2590.712: MHPAEA parity requirements and criteria disclosure · eCFR (National Archives) · checked
  3. 42 CFR 438.406: handling of appeals and the case file · eCFR (National Archives) · checked
  4. About the ASAM Criteria: the six dimensions and the multidimensional assessment · American Society of Addiction Medicine · checked

General information, not legal or medical advice. The denial notice, the plan documents and state law control; state law can give more time or more rights than the federal floor shown here. Read our editorial policy.

Doing this for every denial in the queue?

Send one de-identified denial and get the appeal letter draft, evidence checklist and deadline plan back, checked by a person before it reaches you. $29 per appeal packet, $99 per level-of-care packet; your first packet is free.

Free tools.No patient data needed.